Passing a CMMC audit can seem daunting, but understanding NIST 800-171A is a critical step toward that success. While NIST 800-171 defines the "what" of cybersecurity compliance—outlining 110 high-level controls—NIST 800-171A explains the "how," detailing over 320 assessment objectives that auditors use to verify compliance. This guidance serves as the foundation for building an audit-ready system and ensuring every security requirement is objectively validated.
What is a NIST 800-171A objective?
NIST 800-171 controls may seem straightforward, such as "Limit system access to authorized users," but behind each is a web of specific, testable objectives. These assessment objectives serve as a blueprint for auditors to evaluate compliance. For example, the above control might include verifying processes to identify users, roles, and even system actions that occur on their behalf. By breaking these controls into smaller, measurable pieces, NIST 800-171A provides clarity for both organizations and assessors. Simply meeting a control isn't enough—evidence must align with each mapped objective.
Understanding this structure ensures organizations shift their focus from saying, "We do this" to confidently proving, "Here is the evidence."
Why objectives matter for CMMC compliance
Navigating CMMC Level 2 compliance requires navigating the bridge between NIST 800-171 and NIST 800-171A. It's not just 110 controls that need to pass scrutiny—every associated objective must also be met. Assessors evaluate compliance with each requirement by reviewing all mapped objectives. Any unmet objective may result in the associated requirement being marked "Not Met," potentially derailing certification efforts.
The meticulous nature of this framework ensures that organizations adopt comprehensive evidence-first practices rather than glossing over critical details.
Evidence collection through 171A's methods
To ensure compliance, NIST 800-171A outlines three assessment methods for gathering evidence:
Examine – Review documentation, such as policies, security plans, and system logs, to ensure compliance is formally recorded.
Interview – Speak with personnel responsible for security processes to confirm their knowledge and actions align with documented expectations.
Test – Validate configurations, hardware, or settings to confirm they are operating as intended under real-world conditions.
A robust system security plan (SSP) aligned with these methods simplifies evidence gathering and streamlines audits.
Common pitfalls to avoid
Organizations frequently struggle in areas like Access Control, Configuration Management, and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) handling. Often, technical measures are implemented without sufficient documentation or testing, leading to gaps during audits. Neglecting to align SSP details to assessment objectives is another common error.
Best practices for readiness
Ensure your SSP aligns clearly to each NIST 800-171 requirement, and maintain supporting evidence that maps to the related NIST 800-171A assessment objectives.
Conduct a self-assessment using the "Examine, Interview, Test" approach before audits.
Prioritize higher-risk areas like CUI protection and role-based access control.
By addressing objectives proactively, organizations can avoid last-minute scrambles and ensure smoother progress toward CMMC compliance.
Stop guessing. Start documenting.
Understanding NIST 800-171A isn't just about preparing for an audit—it’s about proving your security culture through ironclad evidence. This framework replaces compliance ambiguity with a tangible, testable roadmap, ensuring you never walk into an assessment empty-handed.
Don't let 320+ objectives overwhelm your team. Partner with Huntress to transform your CMMC hurdles into a manageable, repeatable process. Our platform and SOC experts provide the continuous monitoring and threat detection evidence you need to satisfy assessors and secure your contracts.
Protect What Matters
