Organizations face a massive challenge: employees are still the easiest way for a hacker to get in. Yet managing this "human risk" takes expertise and time that most IT teams just don't have.
Human risk management vendors that offer managed services can help close that gap. They combine purpose-built training and phishing tools with a team of specialists who handle the heavy lifting–designing the program, running phishing simulations, assigning follow-up training, and interpreting the results.
This framework guides IT and security leaders through selecting the right partner by evaluating pricing models, how the platform integrates with your existing stack, and how much management the vendor actually provides.
Understanding human risk and managed services
"Human risk" is just a fancy way of saying that people make mistakes. A single clicked phishing link or a weak password can compromise an entire network. In fact, the 2025 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) found that a whopping 60% of breaches involve a human element.
When so much exposure comes from day-to-day user behavior, it makes sense for organizations to hand off the heavy lifting to a partner that runs security awareness and human risk management as an ongoing service and actively reduces human risk over time.
Human risk vendors with managed services outsource the grunt work. Instead of your internal IT team spending hours creating curriculum and chasing down users, a third-party expert handles the program design, runs it regularly, and provides reporting and recommendations.
This matters because attacker tactics and compliance expectations change faster than a part-time, do-it-yourself awareness program can keep up. With sophisticated phishing campaigns targeting remote workers and compliance frameworks like HIPAA demanding proof of training, you need a partner, not just a tool.
Defining your organizational needs
Before you look at a single vendor, you need to know where you stand. Conduct an internal risk assessment to find your gaps in security awareness and regulatory obligations.
Compliance Drivers: If you are in healthcare, you need training that satisfies HIPAA. If you handle credit cards, you need PCI DSS alignment.
Team Size & Structure: A 50-person dental practice has different needs than a 500-person financial firm. Do you need multi-tenant management (if you're an MSP)? Do you need white-label options?
Current Culture: How does your team handle suspicious emails now? Do they report them, or ignore them?
Document your "must-haves." This list becomes your scorecard to keep you from getting distracted by flashy, unnecessary features during the sales demo.
Selecting the right risk management frameworks
Frameworks like NIST and ISO aren't just for technical controls; they guide how you manage human risk, too.
NIST 800-53 provides the baseline for security and privacy controls, including the requirement to train users on risks. The ISO 27001 standard requires clear evidence of information security awareness.
When choosing a vendor, you want to look for a partner that maps its content to these frameworks. Huntress Security Awareness Training, for example, is built to help you satisfy these specific control requirements, ensuring that your training isn't just "good advice"—it's audit-ready.
Establishing risk categories for your users
Not all users are equal. A smart vendor selection process involves looking for platforms that help you categorize user risk, not just generic organizational risk.
You need a platform that can segment your users:
High-Risk (VAPs): These are your "Very Attacked People." Think C-suite executives, Finance Directors with wire transfer authority, and IT Admins with domain access. They need more frequent, targeted training.
General Users: Standard staff who need baseline cyber hygiene.
Repeat Offenders: Users who consistently fail phishing simulations.
Exploring pricing models
Pricing in the human risk market is all over the place. Here is how to break it down so you don't get ripped off.
Pricing Model | The Good | The Bad | Best For |
All-Inclusive Managed | Best Value. Includes platform, content, and expert management in one flat rate. No hidden fees. | Higher upfront cost than a bare-bones tool. | MSPs and teams who want results without the workload. |
Per-User / Per-Month | Simple and predictable. Costs scale linearly as you hire more people. | Can get pricey for massive enterprises (10k+ users). | Growing businesses with stable headcount. |
Usage-Based | You only pay for what you use (e.g., per phishing email sent). | Avoid this. It financially punishes you for training your team. | Nobody. Seriously, don't do it. |
Tiered | Low entry price for basic features. | Essential features (like reporting) are often locked behind expensive upgrades. | Teams who only need to "check a box" for compliance. |
The takeaway: Look for transparency. You don’t want to be hit with surprise fees for "premium content" or "setup costs."
Integration capabilities
Your SAT platform cannot be an island. It needs to talk to the rest of your stack. Effective integration eliminates manual data entry and helps you automate your response to risk.
Look for these specific connections:
Identity Providers (Microsoft 365 / Google): This is non-negotiable. The platform must automatically sync users. When HR hires someone, they should automatically appear in your training portal.
Endpoint Detection: Can the platform talk to your EDR? If a user's machine is infected, can the system automatically assign them remedial training?
PSA / Ticketing: If you are an MSP, does the platform feed reporting data directly into your ticketing system so you can show value to your clients?
Support for policy-driven training assignments
The old way of training was "assign everyone the same video once a year." The new way is policy-driven automation.
This means the system triggers training based on behavior.
Trigger: A user clicks a link in a phishing simulation.
Policy: Automatically assign the "Spotting Phishing Links" micro-lesson.
This reduces manual work for your IT team and increases accountability. It creates a direct link between a risky action and the solution. Look for vendors that allow you to build these "if-then" workflows easily. Huntress manages this curriculum for you, creating a learning path that evolves based on the current threat landscape.
Automating risk assessments and continuous monitoring
You need to move from "point-in-time" assessments to continuous monitoring.
A good managed platform doesn't just test users once a quarter; it continuously tracks their behavior. It should act as a radar, constantly scanning for:
Engagement: Who is ignoring their training?
Vulnerability: Who is falling for the latest phishing templates?
Reporting: Who is actively reporting suspicious emails to IT?
This creates a "User Risk Score." Instead of a vague feeling that "Dave in Accounting isn't careful," you have a data point: "Dave has a Risk Score of 90/100."
Evaluating vendor reporting features
If you can't prove it, it didn't happen. Reporting is the only way you survive an audit or a board meeting.
Your vendor's reporting needs to be two things: Visual and Exportable.
Visual Dashboards: You need to see your organization's risk posture at a glance. Are click rates going down? Is reporting going up?
Compliance Exports: You need reports that satisfy auditors for SOC 2, HIPAA, or insurance renewals.
Look for platforms that allow you to schedule these reports. You should be able to have a monthly "Executive Summary" land in your inbox automatically, showing the ROI of your security program.
Building collaborative relationships
Finally, stop thinking of this as buying software. You are hiring a partner.
You shouldn't have to submit a ticket to get every phishing campaign started. The vendor should be proactive, pushing new content that matches the latest headlines (like a new tax season scam) without you asking.
Huntress acts as a true partner, curating the content and managing the platform so you can focus on running your business.
Don't just track "completion rates." Monitor Phishing Resilience (are click rates dropping?), Reporting Rate (are users flagging suspicious emails?), and User Risk Scores (is the overall risk of your high-value targets going down?).