Password spraying is a type of brute force cyberattack where hackers use a few common passwords against many user accounts, rather than trying multiple passwords on a single account. This "low and slow" approach helps attackers avoid detection systems that typically lock accounts after multiple failed login attempts.
Password spraying is a stealthy type of brute force attack where hackers attempt a small number of commonly used passwords across many user accounts to bypass detection systems. Unlike traditional brute force attacks, this method generally avoids triggering account lockouts. Watch out for warning signs such as unusual login attempts, failed login spikes across multiple accounts, or access from unknown locations. To protect against password spraying, enforce strong password policies, implement multi-factor authentication, and monitor account activity regularly.
By reading this guide, cybersecurity professionals will learn:
The fundamental mechanics of how password spraying attacks work
How password spraying differs from traditional brute force attacks
Warning signs that indicate an active password spraying campaign
Industry-proven defense strategies to protect against these attacks
Real-world examples and their business impact
Password spraying attacks follow a methodical approach that makes them particularly dangerous for organizations. Unlike traditional brute force attacks that hammer a single account with hundreds of password attempts, password spraying casts a wide net using just a handful of commonly used passwords.
The attack typically unfolds in two phases. First, attackers gather valid usernames through reconnaissance activities such as social media research, company websites, and/or previous data breaches. According to CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency), attackers often target single sign-on (SSO) applications because "federated authentication can help mask malicious traffic."
Second, attackers systematically attempt logins across all collected usernames using the same password before moving to the next password in their list. They commonly target passwords like "123456," "password," company names, or seasonal variations like "Summer2024!"
NordPass recently analyzed data from cyberattacks across 44 countries and found that many people still rely on weak, commonly used passwords. In fact, the top 25 most popular passwords make up about 10% of all passwords in use, with the single most common one accounting for roughly 4% globally.
This lack of uniqueness isn't surprising—research shows that 46% of people prefer easy-to-remember passwords over secure ones. This behavior creates the perfect conditions for attacks like password spraying, which exploit these predictable patterns in password creation.
The technique proves especially effective against:
Applications with default passwords that haven't been changed
Organizations where employees share common password patterns
Systems without proper account lockout policies
Companies that haven't implemented multi-factor authentication
While password spraying falls under the brute force attack category, it operates differently from traditional methods. Understanding these distinctions helps cybersecurity professionals develop more targeted defense strategies.
Traditional Brute Force: Focuses intensively on one account, cycling through thousands of password combinations until finding the correct one or triggering a lockout.
Password Spraying: Distributes attempts across numerous accounts using only a few common passwords, staying below detection thresholds.
Credential Stuffing: Uses previously stolen username-password combinations from data breaches, testing them across multiple services where users might have reused credentials.
The "low and slow" nature of password spraying makes it particularly insidious because it mimics normal user behavior patterns, making detection challenging without proper monitoring systems in place.
Cybersecurity teams should monitor for several key indicators that suggest an active password spraying campaign:
Multiple failed login attempts from the same IP address across different user accounts
Unusual spikes in authentication requests during off-hours
Login attempts from geographically inconsistent locations
Login attempts from environments that do not make sense for normal employees, such as datacenter or VPN IPs
Failed authentication attempts against non-existent or inactive accounts
Simultaneous failed logins across multiple user accounts within short time windows
Authentication attempts using common passwords against various accounts
Successful logins followed immediately by suspicious activities like privilege escalation attempts
According to MITRE ATT&CK framework, password spraying commonly targets management services over standard ports including SSH (22/TCP), RDP (3389/TCP), and HTTP/HTTPS (80/443/TCP).
Password spraying attacks can devastate organizations across multiple dimensions, creating cascading effects that extend far beyond the initial breach.
Successful password spraying attacks typically result in substantial financial losses. Organizations face immediate costs from incident response, forensic investigations, and system remediation. Recovery periods usually span two to four weeks, though complex breaches can extend for months, during which productivity suffers significantly.
The 2019 Citrix breach, attributed to password spraying, compromised over 76,000 individuals' personal information and resulted in substantial legal fees, regulatory scrutiny, and damage control expenses.
Attackers using compromised credentials can wreak havoc on daily operations. They might send malicious company-wide emails, configure new and persistent backdoors for re-sell,cancel critical purchases, re-route ACH payments for vendors alter service delivery schedules, or steal intellectual property. These disruptions can halt productivity organization-wide.
Perhaps the mostPerhaps most damaging, long term impact, long-term, is the erosion of customer confidence. When businesses suffer breaches from relatively simple attacks like password spraying, customers question the organization's commitment to security. This skepticism often leads to customer defection and makes acquiring new customers more challenging.
Defending against password spraying requires a multi-layered approach that addresses both technical vulnerabilities and human factors.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): This represents the single most effective single defense against password spraying. Even if attackers guess correct passwords, MFA requires additional verification factors, making unauthorized access extremely difficult.
Passwordless Authentication: Eliminating passwords entirely through biometric factors, hardware tokens, or magic links removes the primary attack vector altogether.
Following NIST password guidelines, organizations should:
Require longer passphrases rather than complex but shorter passwords
Screen passwords against known breach databases
Eliminate mandatory periodic password changes
Prohibit common password patterns and dictionary words
Login Pattern Analysis: Configure systems to detect multiple failed attempts across different accounts from single IP addresses or geographic locations.
Account Lockout Policies: Implement intelligent lockout mechanisms that balance security with user accessibility. Policies should trigger after a reasonable number of failed attempts while providing clear account recovery processes.
Privileged Access Management (PAM): Critical systems should employ additional protections like single-use passwords that reset after each session, significantly reducing password spraying effectiveness.
Block Anonymization Services: Many attackers use TOR networks or residential proxies to obscure their locations. Blocking these services at the network perimeter provides additional protection.
Geographic Restrictions: Implement location-based access controls that restrict logins from unexpected geographic regions.
In January 2024, Microsoft detected a nation-state password spraying attack against their corporate systems. The attackers successfully compromised a legacy test account that lacked multi-factor authentication, ultimately leading to the theft of Microsoft email messages and source code. This incident highlights how even technology giants remain vulnerable to password spraying when basic security controls are missing.
Citrix fell victim to a password spraying campaign that compromised over 76,000 individuals' personal information, including Social Security numbers and financial details. The attack provided attackers access to Citrix's internal network, resulting in significant regulatory attention, legal costs, and reputation damage.
While technically a credential stuffing attack, Dunkin' Donuts experienced a breach where attackers used stolen credentials to access customer accounts, make unauthorized purchases, and drain loyalty points. This incident demonstrates how password-related attacks can directly impact customer finances and brand trust.
Password spraying attacks exploit one of cybersecurity's most persistent vulnerabilities: human tendency toward weak, predictable passwords. However, organizations that implement comprehensive defense strategies can effectively neutralize these threats.
The most successful defense approach combines strong technical controls like multi-factor authentication provides the strongest single protection, while robust monitoring systems ensure early detection of attack attempts. Regular security awareness training helps employees recognize and report suspicious activities.
Remember that cybercriminals constantly evolve their tactics. Today's password spraying techniques will likely become more sophisticated, making ongoing vigilance and adaptive security measures essential for protecting organizational assets and customer trust.
